"I'm really frustrated," a student came up and announced to me at the end of a Statistics class last week.
"What is frustrating you? How can I help?" I responded sympathetically... at least I tried.
"I'm not getting it, I've spent hours on this class, and I still don't understand," she pined.
"Not getting what?" I figured if we could isolate the specific concept she was struggling with, then maybe we could explore it and help get some clarity. But that's not the direction she was going.
"Everything. This whole class. I should be able to get this, but I don't."
"Well, this is probably a new way of thinking for you," I reassured the student. "It takes some time. You're smart, and I'm sure most of this will fall into place for you. We're just laying the groundwork now. We'll go over these ideas again, do a lot examples and practice scenarios. It's a bit like learning a foreign language--if you hang it there, it will come! Maybe you shouldn't be quite so hard on yourself."
"But this should be easy! I should be getting this quicker!" The tone indicated that the student was expecting mastering by the end of the end of the fifth week of the course, even though the student didn't add the class until the end of the third week, and was still 'catching up.'
Not coincidentally, this is the same student I wrote about last week, who had finished two 3-credit online classes in two weeks. I began wondering if there was a connection between the student's experience in those courses, and their current frustration in mine.
This is not an isolated complaint. I've heard this in many different forms, particularly in classes with a strong critical thinking emphasis, and classes where students are exposed to new concepts which they haven't yet thought much about. Maybe I'm overstating the case (althought I doubt that I am), but it seems like the prevalent attitude among many students is that learning, even in college, should be "quick" and "easy." That putting more than a minimal amount of effort into a course precipitates more than a small degree of exasperation.
I think this is a change I've observed, perhaps over the past decade or so, in college students. (Looking back, I expected college to be challenging! And I wasn't disappointed!) Perhaps it is a societal trend. With lots of "information" at our fingertips, maybe we've mistaken "access to information" for "acquisition of knowledge and/or skills"? Maybe because so much comes "instantly" to us--from instant breakfast and instant coffee to instant communication--that we also expect "instant education."
On another level, I wonder if WE--as educators--are responsible for fostering this "instant, easy learning" phenomena? Have we emphasized "efficiency" so much that we have lost sight of what is "effective" and long-lasting? Have we set up systems that prime our students with the idea that education is meant to be fast and relatively free of effort? Does their perception of our emphasis on "completion" undermine the priority for learning?
"Patience, persistence and perspiration make an unbeatable combination for success."
Napolean Hill, author and advisor to Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt
1883-1970
No comments:
Post a Comment